Baseball Articles

The Guardians Shut Out the White Sox 2–0 With One Swing and 21 Strikeouts

One home run, four pitchers and a record night on the mound sent Cleveland to the ALCS.

José Ramírez, wearing No. 11, celebrates with Guardians teammates on the infield at Progressive Field
José Ramírez (11) and the Guardians celebrate after beating the White Sox in Game 5 at Progressive Field.

Cleveland beat Chicago 2–0 on Saturday night, and the whole game came down to two things: one swing from José Ramírez and a Guardians pitching staff that struck out 21 batters.

By the numbers

21

Guardians strikeouts, a record for a nine-inning postseason game

12

Gavin Williams strikeouts, tying Cleveland's postseason record

3

White Sox hits, none for extra bases

0-for-12

Murakami, Benintendi and Vargas combined

The one swing

For three innings, neither team scored. In the fourth, Ramírez hit a two-run homer off White Sox starter Sean Burke, and that set the tone for the game. Cleveland didn't score again, and honestly, they didn't need to.

Otherwise, Burke's pitching was okay. He pitched five innings, allowed only four hits and struck out four, but one mistake cost him two runs, and Chicago's offense couldn't answer.

The Guardians' pitching

Gavin Williams started and dominated the whole time he was on the mound. Over 5⅔ innings, he allowed one hit, walked two and struck out 12 on 94 pitches. When he left with the bases loaded in the sixth, Erik Sabrowski came in and got the one out Cleveland needed by striking out Munetaka Murakami. Hunter Gaddis followed with 1⅓ innings and four strikeouts, and Cade Smith closed the game with four more strikeouts and the save.

PitcherIPHBBKPitches
Gavin Williams (W)5⅔121294
Erik Sabrowski⅓0015
Hunter Gaddis1⅓20424
Cade Smith (S)1⅔00427
Guardians total93221150

Adding it up

Add it up and Cleveland pitchers struck out 21 of the 33 batters they faced and allowed only three hits. Chicago got a runner on base in only a handful of innings, and none of them scored.

The offense wasn't much better

Yes, Cleveland had only six hits itself and went 0-for-3 with runners in scoring position. Petey Halpin had two doubles, and Steven Kwan, Jo Adell and Chase DeLauter each added a hit. The Guardians didn't pile up runs. They got a homer and let the pitching do the rest.

Chicago had three hits, from Tristan Peters, Sam Antonacci and Kyle Teel, and no extra-base hits. They also committed an error. Their lineup included Munetaka Murakami, Andrew Benintendi and Miguel Vargas, and those three went hitless in a combined 12 at-bats.

The economics of it all

Think of a baseball game as a budget. Every pitcher has a limited number of good pitches in him, and a manager has to spend them wisely. Cleveland spread theirs across four arms instead of riding one pitcher all night, and none of them were asked to do too much.

Williams threw 94 pitches and got 12 strikeouts. That is an efficient use of him. Gaddis and Smith were used in short bursts, and the 21 combined strikeouts show the pitching staff was getting a high return on every pitch spent.

Runs are scarce in a game like this, which makes each one worth far more. In a 9–5 game, one run barely matters. In a 2–0 game, one swing is the whole outcome. Ramírez's homer decided the game because there was so little scoring.

There is also a lesson about incentives. Cleveland went 0-for-3 with runners in scoring position and still won, because the pitching made those misses irrelevant. Chicago had the same problem, and with no pitching cushion, it was fatal. If you can't count on scoring, run prevention is the safer investment.

My unfiltered take

Cleveland did what good teams do: when one swing is enough, protect the lead. The White Sox lineup, with Murakami, Benintendi and Vargas combining to go hitless, did not look like it belonged in this game. Three hits and no extra-base hits is not a lineup built to beat a staff striking out 21.

I'm not worried about Cleveland's offense going 0-for-3 with runners in scoring position. That is the kind of thing that evens out. I'd be more concerned about Chicago, because when you can't generate offense, you're relying on hope.

If I'm the White Sox, I'm asking how a team scores in a game like this. Right now, I don't see the answer.

Landrey